How to perform Cross Browser Testing on Wix Websites

Over 200 million citizenry worldwide use Wix to develop their websites. For customers without any cryptography or design expertise, Wix provides a platform that may be utilized to build a beautiful site with ease. In addition to this, Wix proffer web hosting, enterprise-grade security, and a suite of SEO tools for better marketing. However, ensuring that these websites function right across different browsers is essential.

This guide provides insights into performing cross-browser prove on Wix websites.

Why Test Wix Websites for Cross-Browser Compatibility?

With any site, it & # 8217; s highly important to ensure that the site can be accessed by all possible users. In the current digital age, all serious businesses require a website to represent themselves on the internet. Today & # 8217; s consumers rely heavily on internet content. Therefore, it is lively for any successful company to have a strong online front.

While developing any website, the chief goal is to maximize consumer footfall and revenue. Unfortunately, the large range of available browsers and the plethora of versions of these browsers can complicate web app development.

The ability of a web application to part across the battalion of browser/version combinations is straight correlated with the number of footfalls and revenue generated. If a website is antagonistic with sure browsers, a orotund percentage of the consumer market is lost. can prevent this potential loss of revenue and visibility.

Cross Browser test ensures that the website functions and appears esthetically pleasing across a wide variety of browser, OS, and devices.

Additionally, Cross Browser essay verifies that the website is versatile, approachable, and visually sound prior to release. It is, therefore, an indispensable footstep that must be carried out before deploying any web application.

How to Choose Browsers for Cross-Browser Testing

Although it may seem that there are an vast number of browser/device/OS combinations possible, certain criteria can be used to specify down the tests to the most relevant combination.

The most significant condition when opt which browser to test with can be their level of popularity. The top 10 most used browsers to test on can be regulate using statistics. For exemplar,Statcountershares that 64.68 % of the browser market parcel is maintain by Chrome, making it the most used browser as of December 2022.

Source

Therefore, it can be intelligibly seen that the test engineer ’ s inaugural priority needs to be to ensure that their web coating is functional and visually go on the different versions of Google Chrome first. This is helpful since the test engineer can prioritize and contrive their tests and not drop resources and energy on any unnecessary project. Testing according to usage and popularity statistics helps ensure that the largest portion of your potential consumer demographic is catered to.

In order to determine the browser/OS/device combinations to be screen, it & # 8217; s also fruitful to carry out a thorough analysis. If your site has already been loose, then traffic data can be used to ascertain the browsers and devices most frequently used to access it. This same traffic data can besides be used to determine the nation which most frequently admittance the website, and adjustment can be bestow for those countries (for example, different languages or images). By this method, the website can be updated continuously in order to better serve its consumer substructure.

In the event that this method is not possible, it is withal apt to gather market data for similar web applications and use it to better approximate the potential consumer groundwork.

How to Test a Website for Cross-Browser Compatibility

Before beginning to test for Cross-Browser Compatibility, it & # 8217; s essential to hash out a specification document that item the primary tasks that want to be carried out.

SUSA automates exploratory testing with persona-driven behavior, catching bugs that scripted automation misses.

For representative, One test could be that certain visual appearance or design elements should appear congruent across different browser and devices. Another trial could be the web covering & # 8217; s responsiveness needs to be evaluated to confirm its adaptability and to make certain that adjustments to the screen & # 8217; s dimension and orientation do not play mayhem on the web application & # 8217; s design. Or former elements to be tested, such as fonts or functional elements such as input field, will also be included in this document.

Once this document is created, either manual or automated cross-browser tests can be executed. Although most test cases can be automatise, manual examination may be more appropriate when a human examiner is necessary to secure functionality.

Automated testing is precise and can be carried out on a wide scale at a relatively cheap cost; in demarcation to manual examination, which lead human effort and can be expensive.

Users can considerably benefit from automatise and essay their application with and. Both of these characteristic provide user with the power to mix with a variety of automation model to pack out try on over 3000+ browsers and real devices.

Test scripts can be created quickly using automation frameworks like,,, and. These book can be run on as many browser, OS, and device combinations as necessary.

Using BrowserStack ’ s, you can run tests on multiple device-browser combinations simultaneously use. This makes your release cycle faster, saving time and cost.

However, mechanisation is not the lone option. Web coating can too be manually test on assorted mobile and desktop device using puppet such as. Manual testing can be highly beneficial to affix automated tests. allows the test engineer to emulate how a real user may think and behave. While an machine-driven scheme would only do tasks, it is program to do them. A human exploiter can adapt and vary their behaviour, hence catching more glitch. Therefore for more complex tests which require an understanding of the web application, it & # 8217; s prudent to carry out manual examination.

Interactive can be expend without needs needing to know how to plan. For illustration, developers can chop-chop test their web applications and any updates made to them for responsiveness and cross-browser rendering using BrowserStack Live across a plethora of browser, OS, and real desktop/mobile devices.

Following testing for the lineament lean in the specification document, any bug found should be partake with the developer so that they can be determine. Once errors are fixed it & # 8217; s vital to retest to ensure no new bugs have develop. In the terminal point of testing, it & # 8217; s mostly full practice to document the examination summons and any lessons learned.

Testing a Wix Website with BrowserStack Live: Example

In order to carry out manual cross-browser testing, exploiter can use to control the functionality of their website.

Additionally, site performance and how it renders in can be seen via BrowserStack Live on democratic browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, Yandex, Opera, and IE.

The better part is that testing can be perform on real desktop and roving devices, not emulators, so the exploiter can be ensure that their web coating works in user weather.

Steps to Manually Perform Cross-Browser Testing with BrowserStack Live:

Step 1:Sign up with BrowserStack.

Step 2:Navigate to.

Step 3:Select the OS and version for the background or existent twist you wish to test on. For this illustration, a background with Windows 10 is used.

Step 4:Select a browser to prove your website on. In this example, we ’ ll testthiswebsite designed using Wix on the modish firefox browsers.

Step 5:Alter scene. BrowserStack live allows users to change the location, scope, and screen size to model real user conditions and ensure that the website still functions and appears well-organized for most users.

For example, the resoluteness can be changed from 1536 x 722 (visualize above) to 1680 & # 215; 1050 (pictured below).

Step 6:Highlight and report any glitch you comment.

Users can circle, write, or record any instance of a functional/visual bug easy. Following this, they can report it via various routes such as Email,, Jira, Github, and Trello. They can even download the errors and share them through alternate methods if they like to do so.

Step 7:Carry out further tests on other background or wandering device. Let ’ s try out testing an Apple iPhone 14. For this example, we ’ ve prove on the Safari browser.

Once the website loads, we can once again tinker with multiple settings to simulate the way a real user may end up interacting with the site.

For exemplar, they may reckon the site in Landscape view and zoom in.

Or they may not have the best internet connection. To simulate this, we can and observe how the website functions under such conditions.

Step 8:Test across multiple browser/device combination, and upon corrections, retest across those devices once again to see that no new issues have come up.

Test Result

The website designed using Wix was functional and aesthetically well-organized across a variety of device/OS/browser combinations. Therefore, it can be conclude that the site designed using the Wix platform is highly compatible and caters to a wide ambit of users.

End-note

When it comes to Cross-Browser examination, prove on real background and roving devices is key. Existent device are far superior when compared to copycat, which are notoriously unreliable and don ’ t produce the same results as real devices. Emulators can ’ t recreate the real issues that take spot on real devices, such as incoming messages and outcry or low battery conditions.

A multitude of background browsers and actual mobile devices are accessible through BrowserStack Live, offering complete coverage for cross-browser and cross-platform examination.

Additionally, BrowserStack Automate can be employ to automatize testing across BrowserStack ’ s, which has over 3000+ desktop browsers and real mobile device. BrowserStack ’ s Real Device Cloud, in addition to legacy devices, is besides systematically updated to assure that the exploiter can prove on the latest devices. With such a broad spectrum of devices, developers can be tell that their web application is viable for all of their possible users.

Related Guides