Terms Acceptance Testing Checklist (2026)
The "Terms Acceptance Testing Checklist (2026)" is a critical resource for ensuring that your application's user agreement, privacy policy, or any other mandatory legal document acceptance mechanism f
The "Terms Acceptance Testing Checklist (2026)" is a critical resource for ensuring that your application's user agreement, privacy policy, or any other mandatory legal document acceptance mechanism functions flawlessly, provides a positive user experience, and meets all compliance requirements. This comprehensive guide outlines a structured approach to testing terms acceptance flows, addressing happy paths, error conditions, edge cases, accessibility, security, performance, and release readiness. By meticulously validating each item on this checklist, QA engineers and developers can proactively identify and rectify issues before they impact users or expose the organization to legal risks, ultimately enhancing user trust and maintaining regulatory compliance in an ever-evolving digital landscape.
Validating the terms acceptance process goes beyond simply checking if a user can click "Accept." It involves understanding the various states, user interactions, and system responses that dictate a compliant and robust acceptance flow. As applications become more complex and regulations like GDPR, CCPA, and upcoming data privacy acts evolve, the need for a thorough and repeatable testing methodology becomes paramount. This article provides that methodology, detailed down to specific test cases and expected outcomes.
Core Functionality and Happy Path Testing
The primary goal of terms acceptance is to ensure users can successfully review and agree to the required documents. This section focuses on the most common and expected user interactions.
Initial Display and User Interaction
The first impression of the terms acceptance screen is crucial. It must be clear, readable, and functional.
Test Case Group: Terms Display and Acceptance
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-HP-001 | Verify terms acceptance screen displays on first launch/access. | 1. Clear app data/browser cache. 2. Launch application/Navigate to feature requiring acceptance. | Terms acceptance screen is displayed prominently and blocks further interaction until actioned. | Example: A new user installing an app for the first time. |
| TA-HP-002 | Verify all required legal documents (terms of service, privacy policy) are linked and accessible. | 1. Access terms acceptance screen. 2. Click each legal document link. | Each link opens the corresponding legal document (e.g., in an in-app browser, new tab, or dedicated view). Documents are readable and complete. | Check for broken links (404s), empty pages, or truncated content. |
| TA-HP-003 | Validate "Accept" button is enabled and functional. | 1. Access terms acceptance screen. 2. Click "Accept" button. | User proceeds to the next intended screen/feature. Data indicating acceptance is recorded. | Verify backend logs or user profile for acceptance timestamp. |
| TA-HP-004 | Validate "Decline" / "Cancel" / "Back" button functionality (if present). | 1. Access terms acceptance screen. 2. Click "Decline" / "Cancel" / "Back" button. | User is blocked from proceeding, logged out, or directed to an appropriate fallback screen (e.g., app exit, limited functionality). | Ensure clear messaging explains consequences of declining. |
| TA-HP-005 | Verify scroll functionality for long documents. | 1. Access terms acceptance screen. 2. Open a legal document. 3. Attempt to scroll to the end. | User can smoothly scroll through the entire document. Scroll indicators are present and functional. | Test with documents of varying lengths. |
| TA-HP-006 | Verify explicit consent checkbox (if required). | 1. Access terms acceptance screen. 2. Attempt to click "Accept" without checking the box. 3. Check the box and click "Accept". | 1. "Accept" button is disabled or an error message prevents submission. 2. User proceeds successfully. | Ensure the checkbox is clearly labeled and functional. |
| TA-HP-007 | Verify persistent acceptance across sessions. | 1. Accept terms. 2. Close and re-open application/browser. | Terms acceptance screen does not re-appear. | This confirms acceptance status is stored correctly. |
| TA-HP-008 | Validate acceptance for logged-in vs. guest users. | 1. Test as a logged-in user. 2. Test as a guest user (if applicable). | Acceptance flow behaves as expected for both user types, with appropriate data storage. | Guest users might have temporary acceptance or be prompted to log in/register. |
Versioning and Re-acceptance Scenarios
Legal documents are not static. Changes necessitate re-acceptance. This is a common area for bugs.
Test Case Group: Versioning and Updates
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-VER-001 | Verify re-acceptance prompt on new terms version. | 1. User accepts version 1.0. 2. Backend updates terms to version 1.1. 3. User launches app/accesses feature. | Terms acceptance screen for version 1.1 is displayed prominently and blocks further interaction. | Ensure the new version is clearly indicated. |
| TA-VER-002 | Validate user cannot proceed without accepting new version. | 1. User is presented with new terms version. 2. Attempts to bypass or interact with other app features. | App prevents access to features requiring acceptance until the new terms are accepted. | Greyed-out buttons, modal dialogs, or redirection. |
| TA-VER-003 | Verify acceptance of new version updates stored status. | 1. User accepts new version 1.1. 2. Close and re-open application. | Terms acceptance screen does not re-appear. Backend reflects acceptance of 1.1. | Check database/API for updated version and timestamp. |
| TA-VER-004 | Validate graceful handling of multiple simultaneous updates (unlikely but possible). | 1. User accepts version 1.0. 2. Backend updates to 1.1, then immediately to 1.2. 3. User launches app. | Only the latest version (1.2) is presented for acceptance. | Avoid presenting multiple acceptance screens in quick succession. |
| TA-VER-005 | Verify fallback for users who decline new terms. | 1. User is presented with new terms. 2. User declines. | User is logged out, account is deactivated, or access is restricted as per policy. Clear communication of consequences. | This requires close coordination with product and legal teams. |
Error Handling and Resilience Testing
Robust applications handle unexpected situations gracefully. This section focuses on how the terms acceptance flow reacts to errors, network issues, and invalid states.
Network Interruptions
Network connectivity is never guaranteed. The acceptance flow must account for this.
Test Case Group: Network Failures
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-ERR-001 | Verify terms display with no network connection. | 1. Launch app/access feature with no network. | Application either displays a cached version of terms (if allowed) or a clear "no network" error message. It does not crash. | If terms cannot be loaded, user should be informed. |
| TA-ERR-002 | Validate acceptance submission with intermittent network. | 1. Access terms screen. 2. Start acceptance process. 3. Toggle network off/on during submission. | Application retries submission, shows a "submitting..." state, or presents a clear network error message with retry option. | Avoid silent failures. |
| TA-ERR-003 | Verify re-acceptance after network recovery. | 1. Encounter network error during acceptance. 2. Restore network. | User can successfully re-attempt and complete the acceptance process. | The state should be recoverable, not stuck. |
| TA-ERR-004 | Validate terms loading failure due to network. | 1. Access terms acceptance screen. 2. Simulate network error when terms content is being fetched. | A user-friendly error message is displayed, indicating inability to load terms. App does not crash. | "Unable to load terms. Please check your internet connection and try again." |
Backend Service Failures
The backend is responsible for storing acceptance status. Its unavailability should be handled.
Test Case Group: Backend Issues
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-ERR-005 | Verify acceptance submission when backend is down/unreachable. | 1. Access terms screen. 2. Attempt to accept terms while backend service is simulated as down. | Application displays a clear error message (e.g., "Service unavailable, please try again later"). App does not crash. | Provide a retry mechanism if appropriate. |
| TA-ERR-006 | Validate terms version retrieval failure. | 1. Launch app/access feature. 2. Backend fails to provide current terms version. | App either defaults to a safe, cached version with a warning, or blocks access with an error message. | Crucial for preventing users from using outdated terms. |
| TA-ERR-007 | Validate data corruption/invalid response from backend. | 1. Simulate invalid/malformed data from backend for terms content or acceptance status. | Application handles the malformed data gracefully (e.g., displays an error, falls back to a default, or logs the issue). App does not crash. | Test with empty, null, or incorrect JSON/XML responses. |
User Interface and Input Validation
Ensuring the UI responds correctly to user actions and prevents invalid input.
Test Case Group: UI/Input Errors
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-ERR-008 | Verify multi-click/rapid-click handling on "Accept" button. | 1. Access terms screen. 2. Rapidly click "Accept" multiple times. | The action is processed only once. The UI might disable the button after the first click or show a loading indicator. | Prevent multiple submissions or unintended state changes. |
| TA-ERR-009 | Validate UI response to invalid/missing terms content. | 1. Simulate a scenario where a legal document link leads to empty content or a generic error page. | Application displays a clear message that the content is unavailable or corrupted, rather than a blank screen or crash. | Example: A 404 error on a linked PDF. |
| TA-ERR-010 | Verify behavior when "Accept" button is disabled (e.g., checkbox not checked). | 1. Access terms screen with a mandatory checkbox. 2. Attempt to click disabled "Accept" button. | Button remains disabled. No action is performed. No error is thrown. | Ensure button state accurately reflects readiness for submission. |
Edge Cases and Boundary Conditions
These are the scenarios that often get missed in standard testing but can lead to significant issues.
User Account States
Different user states can affect terms acceptance.
Test Case Group: User Account Edge Cases
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-EDGE-001 | Verify terms acceptance for a newly registered user. | 1. Create a new user account. | Terms acceptance is prompted immediately after registration/first login. | Ensure this is part of the onboarding flow. |
| TA-EDGE-002 | Validate terms acceptance for an existing user logging in after a long hiatus. | 1. User accepts terms. 2. User logs out. 3. Wait for new terms version to be released. 4. User logs in. | New terms version is prompted for acceptance. | Test with different durations of "hiatus." |
| TA-EDGE-003 | Verify behavior for an account that has been suspended/deactivated. | 1. Suspend/deactivate a user account. 2. Attempt to log in/access app. | User is blocked with an appropriate message. Terms acceptance is not prompted or is irrelevant. | Focus on graceful handling. |
| TA-EDGE-004 | Validate terms acceptance after account migration (e.g., from old system). | 1. Simulate user migration from an older system where terms status might be unknown. 2. Log in with migrated account. | Terms acceptance is prompted if status is unknown or if a new version is available since migration. | Ensure no assumptions are made about migrated data. |
Content and Display Edge Cases
How extreme content or display settings affect the terms screen.
Test Case Group: Content & Display Edge Cases
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-EDGE-005 | Verify display of extremely short legal documents. | 1. Configure terms content to be very short (e.g., 1-2 sentences). | The acceptance screen displays correctly without excessive white space or layout issues. | Ensure UI elements render proportionally. |
| TA-EDGE-006 | Validate display of extremely long legal documents (multiple pages). | 1. Configure terms content to be very long (e.g., 20+ pages). | The entire document is scollable and readable. Performance does not degrade significantly. | Check for memory leaks or slowdowns on mobile. |
| TA-EDGE-007 | Verify behavior with special characters or internationalization in terms content. | 1. Use terms content with various special characters, emojis, or non-Latin scripts. | Content renders correctly without corruption. | Important for global applications. |
| TA-EDGE-008 | Validate landscape/portrait mode rotation (mobile apps). | 1. Access terms screen on a mobile device. 2. Rotate device. | UI adapts gracefully to orientation changes without layout breaks or loss of data. | Relevant for native mobile apps. |
| TA-EDGE-009 | Verify behavior with different font sizes/zoom levels (browser, accessibility settings). | 1. Access terms screen. 2. Adjust browser zoom or system font size. | Text remains readable and layout is largely preserved. | Overlapping elements or truncated text are failures. |
| TA-EDGE-010 | Validate terms acceptance in different locales/languages. | 1. Switch application language to a supported locale. 2. Access terms acceptance. | Terms are displayed in the selected language (if translated). UI elements are localized. | If translations are not available, a fallback (e.g., English) should be clear. |
System-Level Edge Cases
Interactions with the operating system or browser.
Test Case Group: System & Browser Edge Cases
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-EDGE-011 | Verify terms acceptance after app update (not terms update). | 1. User accepts terms. 2. Update the application version. 3. Launch updated app. | Terms acceptance screen does not re-appear unless there's a new terms version. | Ensure app updates don't reset acceptance status. |
| TA-EDGE-012 | Validate terms acceptance with strict browser security settings (e.g., third-party cookies disabled). | 1. Configure browser to block specific features (e.g., third-party cookies, JavaScript). 2. Access terms screen. | If functionality is impacted, a clear message is displayed. Otherwise, acceptance proceeds. | Identify dependencies on browser features. |
| TA-EDGE-013 | Verify behavior when user navigates away from terms screen (e.g., using OS back button). | 1. Access terms screen. 2. Use the device's back button or browser back button. | User is blocked from proceeding, redirected to a safe state, or logged out, as per policy. | Prevent users from sidestepping acceptance. |
| TA-EDGE-014 | Validate terms acceptance in incognito/private browsing mode. | 1. Open an incognito/private browser window. 2. Access application and terms screen. | Acceptance proceeds as normal, though persistence might be limited to the session. | Crucial for understanding cookie/local storage dependencies. |
Accessibility Testing
Ensuring the terms acceptance flow is usable by everyone, including individuals with disabilities, is a legal and ethical imperative. WCAG guidelines are the standard.
Visual and Navigational Accessibility
Focus on screen reader compatibility, keyboard navigation, and visual clarity.
Test Case Group: Visual & Navigational Accessibility
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-ACC-001 | Verify keyboard navigability of all interactive elements. | 1. Use Tab key to navigate through links, buttons, and checkboxes. | All interactive elements receive focus in a logical order. Focus indicator is visible. | Ensure no elements are skipped. |
| TA-ACC-002 | Validate screen reader compatibility (e.g., VoiceOver, TalkBack, NVDA). | 1. Enable screen reader. 2. Navigate terms acceptance screen. | All text, links, buttons, and checkboxes are correctly announced with their purpose. | "Accept button", "Privacy Policy link", "Checkbox, not checked, I agree to the terms". |
| TA-ACC-003 | Verify sufficient color contrast for text and interactive elements. | 1. Use a contrast checker tool (e.g., WebAIM Contrast Checker). | Text and background colors meet WCAG 2.1 AA (or AAA) contrast ratios. | Especially important for disabled/enabled button states. |
| TA-ACC-004 | Validate clear and descriptive focus indicators. | 1. Navigate with keyboard. | A visible, distinct outline or highlight appears around the currently focused element. | Ensure it's not just a subtle color change. |
| TA-ACC-005 | Verify proper heading structure for terms content. | 1. Use accessibility inspector/screen reader to check heading levels (H1, H2, etc.). | Terms content uses semantic HTML headings to convey structure. | Aids navigation for screen reader users. |
| TA-ACC-006 | Validate proper ARIA attributes for custom controls (if any). | 1. Inspect custom elements (e.g., custom checkbox). | role, aria-label, aria-checked, tabindex are correctly applied. | Avoid generic div elements acting as buttons without proper ARIA. |
Readability and Comprehension
Even if accessible, the content must be understandable.
Test Case Group: Readability
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-ACC-007 | Verify text readability at various zoom levels. | 1. Zoom browser to 200%, 400%. | Text remains legible, and layout reflows gracefully without horizontal scrolling. | No overlapping text or broken layouts. |
| TA-ACC-008 | Validate font size and line spacing for optimal readability. | 1. Visually inspect text. | Font size is at least 16px for body text, and line height is adequate (e.g., 1.5x font size). | Avoid dense blocks of small text. |
| TA-ACC-009 | Verify clear and concise language in prompts and error messages. | 1. Review all user-facing text. | Language is free of jargon, unambiguous, and easy to understand. | Error messages should guide the user, not confuse them. |
Autonomous QA platforms like SUSATest can significantly streamline accessibility testing for terms acceptance flows. By deploying an APK or pointing to a web URL, SUSATest's "Accessibility Persona" automatically navigates the application, performing WCAG compliance checks. It identifies issues such as insufficient color contrast, missing ARIA attributes, improper focus management, and unreadable text, providing detailed reports with remediation steps. This automated exploration covers many of these accessibility test cases in a single pass, complementing manual assistive technology testing.
Security and Privacy Testing
Protecting user data and ensuring the integrity of the acceptance process is paramount.
Data Transmission and Storage
How acceptance data is handled.
Test Case Group: Data Security & Privacy
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-SEC-001 | Verify acceptance status is stored securely and linked to the user. | 1. Accept terms. 2. Inspect backend storage (database/API). | Acceptance status, version, and timestamp are securely stored and associated with the correct user ID. | No PII in logs unless absolutely necessary and masked. |
| TA-SEC-002 | Validate all communication (terms fetching, acceptance submission) uses HTTPS/TLS. | 1. Use network monitoring tools (e.g., Fiddler, Wireshark, browser dev tools). | All network requests related to terms acceptance are encrypted. | Look for insecure HTTP requests. |
| TA-SEC-003 | Verify protection against unauthorized modification of acceptance status. | 1. Attempt to bypass acceptance via API calls or client-side manipulation. | Backend rejects unauthorized attempts to update acceptance status. | Requires backend validation of user session and permissions. |
| TA-SEC-004 | Validate no sensitive user data is exposed in terms acceptance logs. | 1. Review application logs and server logs. | Logs related to terms acceptance contain only necessary, non-sensitive information. | Avoid logging full user IDs or email addresses unless anonymized. |
Content Integrity
Ensuring the legal documents themselves haven't been tampered with.
Test Case Group: Content Integrity
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-SEC-005 | Verify terms content is served from a trusted source. | 1. Inspect the URL/source of the legal documents. | Documents are served from a controlled and secure domain. | Avoid loading legal documents from untrusted third-party CDNs if possible. |
| TA-SEC-006 | Validate against Content Security Policy (CSP) bypasses (web). | 1. Attempt XSS or injection via terms content (if dynamic). | CSP prevents execution of unauthorized scripts or content. | If terms are loaded via an iframe, ensure proper sandboxing. |
| TA-SEC-007 | Verify no malicious code can be injected via terms content. | 1. Attempt to inject scripts or malicious HTML into the terms content (if dynamically loaded). | The content is sanitized, and any malicious input is rendered inert. | This is critical if terms are managed via a CMS. |
Session Management
How acceptance interacts with user sessions.
Test Case Group: Session Management
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-SEC-008 | Validate terms acceptance with expired session. | 1. Access terms screen. 2. Let session expire (e.g., wait timeout). 3. Attempt to accept. | User is prompted to re-authenticate or session expired message is displayed. | Prevent acceptance on behalf of an unauthorized user. |
| TA-SEC-009 | Verify terms acceptance after forced password reset. | 1. Accept terms. 2. Admin forces password reset. 3. User logs in with new password. | Terms acceptance status persists (unless policy dictates re-acceptance after reset). | Ensure security actions don't inadvertently invalidate legal agreements. |
Performance Testing
The terms acceptance flow should be quick and responsive, not a bottleneck.
Load Times and Responsiveness
How quickly the terms screen appears and responds.
Test Case Group: Performance
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-PERF-001 | Measure terms screen load time on first access. | 1. Clear cache. 2. Launch app/access feature. 3. Measure time to display. | Screen loads within acceptable limits (e.g., < 2 seconds for web, < 1 second for native). | Use browser dev tools (network tab) or mobile profiling tools. |
| TA-PERF-002 | Measure terms document load time (if external). | 1. Click link to legal document. 2. Measure time to display document. | Document loads quickly, especially for long documents. | Avoid excessive latency for external resources. |
| TA-PERF-003 | Verify responsiveness of "Accept" button after click. | 1. Click "Accept" button. 2. Measure time until next screen/action. | Transition is immediate or shows a quick loading indicator. | Avoid noticeable lags. |
| TA-PERF-004 | Validate performance under high user concurrency (load testing). | 1. Simulate many users accepting terms simultaneously. | System remains responsive, and acceptance operations complete successfully. | Use JMeter, LoadRunner, or similar tools. |
Resource Consumption
Impact on device resources.
Test Case Group: Resource Usage
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-PERF-005 | Monitor CPU/memory usage during terms acceptance. | 1. Use OS/device monitoring tools. 2. Navigate through acceptance flow. | No significant spikes in CPU or memory usage. | Especially for mobile devices. |
| TA-PERF-006 | Verify minimal battery drain (mobile apps). | 1. Monitor battery usage during repeated terms acceptance. | No excessive battery consumption attributable to the terms flow. | Long documents or complex animations could be culprits. |
Release Readiness and Post-Deployment Checks
Before and after deployment, specific checks ensure the terms acceptance is correctly configured and monitored.
Configuration and Environment Checks
Ensuring the right terms are deployed to the right environment.
Test Case Group: Release Readiness
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-REL-001 | Verify correct terms version is deployed to production. | 1. Access production environment. 2. Check terms version displayed. | The latest, approved legal document version is active. | Cross-reference with legal team's official version. |
| TA-REL-002 | Validate all external links in terms content are correct and production-ready. | 1. Click all links within the terms content. | All links point to the correct production URLs and are functional. | Avoid staging/dev links in production terms. |
| TA-REL-003 | Verify backend flags/configurations for terms acceptance are correctly set. | 1. Verify feature flags, version numbers, or forced re-acceptance settings. | All configurations align with the intended deployment strategy. | This is often a pre-deployment checklist item. |
| TA-REL-004 | Validate terms acceptance data retention policy. | 1. Confirm with data governance. | Acceptance records are retained for the legally required duration. | Not a functional test, but a critical compliance check. |
Monitoring and Logging
Ability to track and troubleshoot terms acceptance in production.
Test Case Group: Monitoring & Logging
| Test ID | Test Case Description | Steps to Reproduce | Expected Result (Pass Criteria) | Notes/Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA-REL-005 | Verify logs are generated for terms acceptance/rejection. | 1. Accept/decline terms. 2. Check application/server logs. | Clear, actionable log entries are generated for each acceptance/rejection event. | Include user ID, timestamp, terms version, and outcome. |
| TA-REL-006 | Validate error alerting is configured for terms acceptance failures. | 1. Simulate a terms acceptance failure (e.g., backend error). | Alerts are triggered to the relevant teams (e.g., PagerDuty, Slack). | Proactive notification of critical issues. |
| TA-REL-007 | Verify analytics events are fired for terms acceptance flow. | 1. Accept/decline terms. 2. Check analytics dashboard (e.g., Google Analytics, Mixpanel). | Events for "terms_viewed", "terms_accepted", "terms_declined" are recorded. | Useful for understanding user drop-off. |
| TA-REL-008 | Validate audit trails for terms version changes. | 1. Check change management system. | All changes to legal documents and their versions are auditable. | Ensures compliance and traceability. |
Leveraging Autonomous QA for Terms Acceptance Testing
While this checklist is extensive, manually executing every item for every release can be a time-consuming and resource-intensive endeavor. This is where autonomous QA platforms like SUSATest demonstrate significant value, particularly for the core functionality, error handling, edge cases, and accessibility aspects of terms acceptance.
SUSATest's approach starts by taking an application in its raw form – an APK for Android or a URL for a web application. It then intelligently explores the application without requiring pre-written scripts. For a terms acceptance flow, this means:
- Automatic Discovery of Acceptance Flows: SUSAT
Test Your App Autonomously
Upload your APK or URL. SUSA explores like 10 real users — finds bugs, accessibility violations, and security issues. No scripts.
Try SUSA Free