100+ Test Cases for Search Functionality [Examples + Free Template]

Search functionality is an interesting but complex region when it comes to prove. A hunt functionality is by definition a search engine, which deals with immense amounts of data and an underlying search algorithm built on complex statistical models.
 

Understanding that challenge, in this clause, we will list out the most common and essential test cases for search functionality and categorize them in groups. We also include a & nbsp;sample tryout case document for this pageso that you can get started more speedily.

Free Test Case Template To Download

To outdo write your test example, you should always have a & nbsp;test event template, which we have cook Excel sheet formats for you to download. Simply hit the button below and start noting down your test lawsuit right away.

Or Simply Manage All of Your Test Cases With Katalon TestOps

Important Test Cases For Search Functionality

1. Test Cases For Search Functionality in Ecommerce Website

Ecommerce websites pose unparalleled challenges when it comes to testing the search functionality due to the large volume of customers having eminent expectations for the search results. Many Ecommerce websites even employ predictive analytics to orient the search results to the client behavior. Here are some crucial test instance for the search functionality on Ecommerce website:

1. Verify that the search bar is prominently expose on the homepage.
2. Enter a valid ware name and ensure relevant resultant are displayed.
3. Enter a inquiry with multiple keywords and confirm accurate results.
4. Check if search results exhibit product ikon, names, prices, and descriptions.
5. Verify that filters (e.g., assort, category, terms ambit) employment correctly with search results.
6. Test the `` Search As You Type '' feature for real-time suggestions.
7. Ensure the search functionality supports auto-correction for misspelled words.
8. Test the pagination of hunt results when there are multiple page of results.
9. Verify that the search results can be shared via societal medium or email.
10. Check if the search history is displayed and functional.
11. Test the responsiveness of the search characteristic on different device (desktop, mobile, tablet).
12. Verify that the search functionality supports voice search.
13. Check if the `` Did you mean? '' feature provides relevant trace for ambiguous queries.
14. Test the swiftness of search results retrieval for a high-traffic scenario.
15. Verify that the search functionality integrates with the situation 's recommendation engine.

2. Negative Test Cases For Search Functionality

Users don ’ t constantly behave in the way we expect them to be. That ’ s why we too need negative examination example, which are test causa for invalid and unexpected conditions/scenarios. For example:

1. Enter an vacuous search query and ensure it provides an appropriate error message or execute n't pioneer a hunt.
2. Search for a product or term that does n't exist in the database and verify that it returns no results.
3. Use special fiber (e.g., @, $, %) in the search enquiry and validate how they are handled.
4. Enter a search query that exceeds the lineament limit permit and control how it 's managed.
5. Attempt to look habituate data types former than text, such as numbers or symbol.
6. Search for a product or condition utilize wrong capitalization and verify if the hunt is case-sensitive or not.
7. Enter search queries that consist of common halt words (e.g., `` and, '' `` the '') and ensure they are handled aright.
8. Add unnecessary space at the beginning or end of the search query and sustain how it 's treated.
9. Enter queries with unsupported lineament or symbols that should be filtered or replaced.
10. Attempt to search while the site is undergoing maintenance or updates and assess how it 's handled.
11. Conduct searches with a deliberately dim or unreliable network connection to test the scheme 's reply time.
12. Enter data in an incorrect format for the search query, such as entering a date in a text search.
13. Test if the sorting options (e.g., toll low to high) employment as wait and that they do n't produce incorrect results.
14. Interrupt a search operation by navigating to a different page or clicking away and assess how it cover the intermission.
15. Attempt to search when the search feature is advisedly handicapped or hidden and verify its behavior.
16. Enter mixed-language queries with text in different languages and check how it construe and processes them.
     

3. Query Input Test For Search Feature

Before conducting this eccentric of screen, note that there are several types of search methods used to retrieve information from databases, including:

• Keyword Search: the most basic type of hunting where users enter one or more keywords to find information twin those terms.
• Boolean Search: exploiter can combine keywords using logical operator (AND, OR, NOT) to refine search results. This is commonly reckon as an Advanced search feature.
• Natural Language Search: Natural words search allows users to enroll queries in plain, everyday lyric. This is a growing type of search with & nbsp;Google 's upcoming SGE.
• Faceted Search: this method lets exploiter filter hunting results based on predefined categories or dimension (facets). It 's often used in e-commerce websites to refine product searches.
• Geospatial Search: this focuses on finding information base on geographic location or coordinates. It is commonly used in mapping and location-based services.
• Voice Search: piece relatively new, voice hunting allows users to perform searches habituate voice commands or speech recognition technology.
   

For autonomous testing across multiple user personas, check out SUSATest — it explores your app like 10 different real users.

Here are some common test cases for the query input:

1. Test single-word queries.
2. Test multi-word enquiry with infinite.
3. Enter queries with synonym and ensure they yield consistent results.
4. Test queries with hyphens and peculiar characters.
5. Use Boolean operators (AND, OR) in hunting queries and confirm correct behavior.
6. Verify the handling of upper and lower case characters in interrogation.
7. Test search queries with & nbsp;diacritics and accented character
8. Enter queries with numeric values and see for relevant results.
9. Use wildcard characters (* or?) in question and validate their impact on resolution.
10. Test interrogation with stop lyric (common words like `` and, '' `` the '') and verify they are handled right.
11. Enter queries with common misspellings and assess auto-correction.
12. Test vocalisation search with both clear and tonic pronunciation.
13. Verify the behavior when enrol queries in different words.
14. Test queries with geographic or location-based keywords.
15. Enter equivocal question and tax the accuracy of suggested alternatives.

4. Test Cases For Search Results Evaluation

The quality of hunt results is the main indicator of hunt functionality lineament. The most important factor is & nbsp;relevance: a good search result should closely match the exploiter 's question and furnish information that is directly relate to their search intent. Other aspects include:

• Completeness: perform the search result include a comprehensive set of reply link to the original search input?
• Clarity: & nbsp;is the hunting event presented in an easy-to-understand manner?
• Consistency: & nbsp;can users predict where to find specific types of info within the resultant?
• Ranking by Relevance: & nbsp;are most relevant results order at the top and less relevant results grade at lower positions?
• Rich snipping: & nbsp;are related product information (rating, product description, product rubric, etc.) included in the search results?

Here are some test cases to help you judge the search result quality:

1. Verify that the most relevant results appear at the top of the list.
2. Test sorting options (e.g., price low to high) and validate correct order.
3. Check if the bit of results match the displayed count.
4. Test the display of product images for all hunting results.
5. Verify that product name and description match the query.
6. Test the accuracy of displayed product prices.
7. Check if product rating and reviews are correctly associated with search results.
8. Enter a interrogation for a specific brand and verify that only relevant products are display.
9. Test the `` Quick View '' characteristic to ensure it opens the right product details.
10. Verify that product handiness (in stock/out of stock) matches the search results.
11. Test the display of related products or proposition alongside search results.
12. Check if sponsored or promoted products are clearly labeled.
13. Test the behavior when a exploiter clicks on a hunting result link.
14. Verify that search results can be easily added to a shopping go-cart or wish inclination.
15. Test the performance of search results loading under heavy user traffic.

5. Performance Test Cases For Search Functionality

These test cases allow you to evaluate if the search functionality can cover bombastic mass of users using it at the same clip:

1. Conduct load testing with multiple coincident search question.
2. Assess the response time of the search characteristic under typical load conditions.
3. Test the hunting functionality 's reaction to sudden spikes in traffic.
4. Verify that the search system sustain performance during peak shopping hours.
5. Test the impact of eminent volumes of concurrent user search on server resources.
6. Assess the scalability of the search system with increase numbers of products.
7. Verify that search consequence load expeditiously on mobile device with varying network speeds.
8. Test the caching mechanics for frequently explore query.
9. Assess the system 's response to a gradual gain in catalog size.
10. Measure the time it takes to update search index data when new products are supply.

6. User Experience Testing For Search Feature

Here we try to evaluate and value how existent exploiter interact with and experience the lookup functionality.

1. Evaluate the placement and profile of the search bar on the website.
2. Test the reactivity and compatibility of the search feature on different device and browser.
3. Verify that the search bar accepts user inputs without delays.
4. Check if search trace and auto-corrections are helpful and user-friendly.
5. Assess the pellucidity of mistake substance and guidance provided to users.
6. Test the usability of filters and sorting option in elaborate hunting results.
7. Verify that search results are presented in a visually appealing and organized manner.
8. Test the strength of the `` Search As You Type '' lineament in supply relevant suggestions.
9. Assess the accessibility of the search characteristic for exploiter with disabilities.
10. Evaluate the user experience of vox search, including accuracy and ease of use.
11. Check if the hunting characteristic maintains user lookup history and provides easygoing approach.
12. Verify that the search feature offers open navigation to refine or expand hunt queries.
13. Test the potency of product recommendations integrated with search results.
14. Assess the performance of the search feature during high-traffic periods.
15. Solicit user feedback and preferences through usability testing and survey.

How To Test Better With Katalon Platform

is a comprehensive AI-augmented package quality management program, helping you to orchestrate the entire API testing lifecycle from test conception, execution, maintenance, to reporting.

Katalon is best when teams don ’ t want to go through the trouble of building their own testing framework. To enable testing professionals to test UI and API in one property, Katalon is the complete solution for web, wandering and desktop software quality management.

Without having to go from tool to tool for different quiz types and purposes, you get a full-fledged testing workspace to automatize testing for digital products, including the undermentioned amazing lineament:

• 3 Test authoring modes: For teams that desire to get started cursorily, Katalon offers Record-and-playback and Built-in Keywords for you to create your trial quickly without have to write a single line of code. For users who want more customization, there is a Java/Groovy scripting mode.
• Test Organization: all test objects captured during Record-and-Playback sessions are organized in the Object Repository, which can be accessed easily to during test author modality, enabling even faster test creation.
• Compatibility try: local and cloud browsers, devices, and operating systems are usable to run cross-platform API, end-to-end and regression test suites in parallel.
• Easy maintenance: An object repository is built-in to store and access all of your UI component, objects and locators. Easily update tests when the application 's UI changes. & nbsp;
• Requirements traceability: Aboriginal integrations with Jira, qTest and Xray.
• Test Reporting and Analytics: after trial run, Katalon return detailed reports in democratic formats that you can speedily share to your team and stakeholders to help everyone gain perceptivity on functional testing operation and make informed decisions. Katalon desegregate seamlessly with many communication technologies to further enhance collaboration.

Read More On Our Lists Of Test Cases

1.

2.

3.